Airbus And Boeing Companies Comparison Case

Airbus and Boeing Companies Comparison Case Case Study

Production processes

To start with, both aerospace corporations have engaged in manufacturing wars by taking the least time attainable to manufacture their plane. This notion can also be aimed at producing as many planes as possible in order to enhance sales volume and secure a larger market share.

301 certified writers online

For instance, the Airbus aerospace company presently manufactures the A320 series at a pace of forty-two plane per month. On the opposite hand, the rate at which the A330 sequence is produced is ten plane per month, whereas three plane are manufactured each month for the A380 sequence. Within the following three years or so, the corporate is aiming to increase the production of the A380 series to 10 per thirty days. In addition, the corporate is presently pondering over the potential of beginning a brand new line of merchandise generally known as the A350 series.

On the other hand, the 737 series from the Boeing Company is currently manufactured at a fee of forty two plane per thirty days. eight.3 per 30 days is the rate for the 777, while the 747-8F is manufactured at a speed of 1.seventy five per 30 days.

As could be seen from the above comparability, Boeing has a higher production rate than Airbus. This partially explains why Boeing remains the largest market shareholder within the aerospace trade. However, the corporate needs to probably cut back its production and focus extra on high quality so that the latest spates of mechanical problems reported by various airline corporations could be eliminated. Besides, it’s pertinent to say that the manufacturing charges for aircraft in each corporations have apparently strained the supply chain procedures. Both manufacturers have always geared up for giant jetliners without considering the side effects within the supply chain processes.

Outsourcing is yet one more manufacturing characteristic of the 2 airline corporations. The previous few years have witnessed both companies outsourcing parts and supplies earlier than finally assembling their jets. Supplies management, components, and design are a few of the features outsourced by the two manufacturers. While outsourcing has been a well-liked production practice for Boeing, it has equally led to myriads of manufacturing challenges, together with long delays and overruns by way of prices.

As of 2013, Boeing was nonetheless struggling to finish a fleet of about forty Dreamliners. Clients at the moment are expected to receive their orders nearly three years late. Although outsourcing was meant to lower the price of production, the unexpected effects have derailed the manufacturing course of at Boeing.

The Airbus Company additionally suffered an analogous problem: delays and unnecessary prices after being disappointed by suppliers. Airbus has opted to collaborate intently with its suppliers in order to facilitate clean coordination throughout the process of production. Contactors are additionally assisted by engineers dispatched from the Airbus Company.

Proposed Business Process Management (BPM) for Boeing

Any BPM proposed for the aerospace company Boeing ought to keenly look at and manage processes which might be currently executed at the company. These processes could range from production, storage, advertising, distribution, and sales. Boeing wants a BPM because it’s presently going through manufacturing (delays) and high quality crises.

As it stands now, the company lacks an efficient monitoring section in the BPM of its production. There is a necessity to trace individual processes of production (similar to outsourcing, assembling deadlines, dispatch of orders, delivery of provides, and so on). Statistics on the efficiency of every course of is critical. The quality challenges noted in the Boeing Jetliners have been occasioned by poor monitoring of processes. A slight omission of a manufacturing process results in poor quality.

Monitoring may also improve the pace of processing orders from clients. At the folks part, the company ought to appraise the productivity of its staff on a regular basis alongside providing incentives to its labor force as a part of the motivation. The people part, viable instruments, and strategies ought to be availed to employees so that they’ll cut back defect rate and cycle time throughout production.





Unfortunately, your browser is just too old to work on this website.

Type Case Study
Pages 2
Words 644

Case Study
Language 🇬🇧 English

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *