Analytical Paper – Common Assignment Sovereignty

Analytical Paper – Common Assignment


Since independence nation have always aspired to be self-reliant and be independent. Sovereignty therefore is the right of states to have their own authority and autonomy. Within the corporate world, conflicts have always been witnessed when nations scramble for the border ownership rights. However, the rights of a state to have their own sovereign powers have always safeguarded the minority nations for they have all the rights to protect their land and resources from other exploitative states that consider themselves as super powers (Walters, & Cornelisse, 2010). The major issue addressed in the paper is the aspects of nations to have their sovereign rights to protect their borders.

Question one

Global issue

The major global issue is sovereignty among nations, which is the possessive rights of a nation to be independent and can rule by themselves. In the recent passed nearly all nations are considered independent as limitation that could hinder the states from achieving a political self-determination had been abandoned. However, attainment of such rights has always triggered conflict among nations, the conflicts have always been initiated mostly by nations which colonized such countries for, one; access to raw materials for their industries back at will be limited (Walters., & Cornelisse, 2010). Secondly, such country will not get enough source of labor for their industries, and lastly their finished products will not get a quick market.

From the article, there are examples that can point to episodes of sovereignty that have failed thus leading to adverse effects like terrorism. In the year 1978 of Camp David that was between Egypt and Israel where the principles of self-reliance and self-determination to the Politicians was never embraced that would accord the citizens to be independent that would help them to make negotiations by themselves that will see the controversies in Palestine solved (Walters., & Cornelisse, 2010). Moreover, the approach that embraced self-determination was not well explained as during the era when nations needed to be decolonized.

Question two

Theory and Support

The author artistically tackles the issue that raises the global concern. The issue of the nation’s being self-reliant is given much weight. The author expresses the need of the nation being able to have the rights of self-determination. The denial of the states to be independent has always contributed to be the major cause of terrorism as the countries will tend to revolt in order to gain their independence. Once a nation is built on terrorism it will be a global issue (Walters, & Cornelisse, 2010). Conflicts at the borders over possessions rights will bring about political instability making the neighboring nation to be easily attacked through the borders.

Based on theoretical perspective, the aspect of liberalism used to express certain political philosophy to give emphasis on freedom and liberty. The theory therefore tends to address the essence of having individual freedom for all nations for they have to be at liberty. Moreover, the aspect of realism is also reflected as the theories were based on facts that were evident in many states. The theories assumed that the rise of terrorism were because of the political instabilities that were mostly rampant at the borders due to scramble of possession (Walters, & Cornelisse, 2010). For instance, the incidences of attack by Iraq on Kuwait were as a result for the fight of liberty and self-determination.

Question three

Main actors, level of analysis, How are they affected?

The main actors in the article are North Korea and United States of America.The US is always considered as the superpower and it has always gained supremacy over many nations. South Korea, which after attaining its self-determination had the desire to launch its nucleus, weapons to fight other nations. The global issue of sovereignty had affected South Korea from many angles. The nation was constantly attacked by America because it had the VETO power it they could not questions its dominance (Walters, & Cornelisse, 2010). For the case of America, which had, power over all nations was placed under restrictions that it had to take into consideration the plight of other nations as well.

The two major actors in the article operate at the global level because their issues attract an international attention. The actors embrace an international look because they pertain to issues of international interests like decolonization and involving other counties across its borders. Additionally, the actors are perceived to be acting at the international level because the problems they face not only serve their personal interests; for instance the issues of refugees who comes from war torn nations  is a clear indication of their level of operation (Walters., & Cornelisse, 2010). The sovereign obligations therefore call for the responsibility of the nations to carter for the refugees.

The global issues have affected the actors either positively or negatively. For the case of South Korea, the aspect of being granted the right of self-determination has made it have the authority to develop nuclear weapons that are harmful to humanity. Consequently, the guarantee has led to the rise in terrorism in the Islamic nations, as they tend to rebel and gain their sovereign rights over their territorial borders. Moreover, the United States of America had some of its powers over nations reduced because most of the nations had realized the need to be independent (Walters, & Cornelisse, 2010). The supremacy of USA over nations had led to the rise of war out of rebellions leading to the rise in the number of refugees, and as a result, the US government had to provide for them despite the number.

Question four

What should be done, what actors should respond to

The quest for sovereignty and freedom has consequently led to the increase in tension and conflict in many nations. It is therefore upon the initiative of the actors to find an appropriate solution to such complexities. To avoid the same problems negotiations van be formulated in order to come with the possible outcomes that can addressed the issue of possessing missiles and other nuclear weapons (Walters., & Cornelisse, 2010). The actors should therefore enact the disarmament policies to restrict the use of such weapons in times of war.

With regard to current situation where refugees flee from their homes because of political instability associated with wars. The situation is a true reflection of what happens during the ancient times where the struggle over supremacy and self-determination of nations led to the outbreak of war making citizens to vacate such countries. The problem of refugees flocking into other countries calls for the initiative of both an individual, governmental and nongovernmental organization (NGOs) to find a lasting solution to the crisis. The Nongovernmental organizations will provide both the shelter and food to the affected families (Walters, & Cornelisse, 2010). The government has the mandate of negotiating with the war torn country and coming with a lasting solution that will see the refugees go back to their country.

Conclusively, sovereignty as the major global issue for most nations in the article is the possessive rights of being independent and free from any colonization. The continued rule will make nations to revolt thus leading to the outbreak of wars.


Walters, W., & Cornelisse, G. (2010). The deportation regime: Sovereignty, space, and the freedom of movement. N. De Genova, & N. Peutz (Eds.). Duke University 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *