Democracy within the United States System Essay (Critical Writing)
Lots of nations are actually preoccupied with growing democracies. The central goal is to make the desire of the bulk exercised. There are many approaches to reach this objective. Some countries have quite a few political events which might be seen as certain representation of some teams of people. The USA is the one democracy with two parties. Some may consider this to be an obstacle to a democracy as, seemingly, only two main teams can achieve their goals. However, I consider this political system is an excellent approach to achieve true democracy.
301 certified writers on-line
The Two Parties Address Issues of All Groups of the US Population
In the first place, it is needed to note that Americans have been living with this pattern for more than 200 years. This system has labored for them thus far. Of course, it’s inconceivable to say that all teams of individuals get pleasure from the same rights and have similar opportunities in this country. Nonetheless, the need of the majority is exercised.
Those who believe two parties can’t tackle all the problems current within the society concentrate on the variety of events quite than on their activities. Thus, the existence of two parties does not mean that rights of two groups are secured whereas all the remainder of teams aren’t represented in legislative our bodies. The two events have representatives of the vast majority of groups who reveal their wants and inclinations. The two parties simply have two fairly completely different approaches to succeed in goals and meet expectations of quite a lot of groups of people.
Two-Party System Is More Effective
Therefore, the 2-party system does not imply that there are advantages for a small group of people at the expense of the remainder. More so, this system is more practical as the two parties have consistent approaches to reaching goals. Many political parties within the legislative physique can typically result in ineffectiveness of this body as the events have totally different views on core points. When it comes to the USA, all democrats (in addition to all conservatives) have a specific program the place major issues are perfectly outlined (Burnell & Ware, 2007). Therefore, the get together’s choices are consistent. At the identical time, the nation does not run the risk of changing into an autocracy as choices of democrats are weighed by conservatives who do not let their rivals to cross legal guidelines which could be harmful for the country (and vice versa). The rivalry between the 2 parties brings stability.
Finally, existence of many parties may also lead to financial losses. That is not any information that political events are funded. Eventually, tax payers should lose their cash (Burnell & Ware, 2007). Funding two parties could also be fairly costly. However, funding many events that fail to supply effective laws is very costly and ineffective.
To sum up, it is attainable to note that the US approach to democracy, i.e. two political parties, is efficient as all teams of citizens of the USA (and even immigrants) can articulate their wants and inclinations. These wants might be addressed by the two parties. Of course, there may be no democracy with one get together, as this may result in autocracy. The existence of two events ensures steadiness as every party has fairly completely different approach and weighs each incentive instructed by the rival. It can also be related to increased effectiveness and less funding, which is very important.
Burnell, P.J., & Ware, A. (2007). Funding Democratization. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
|Type||Essay Critical Writing|
Politics & Government