Multinational Corporations Operating Regionally

Multinational Corporations Functioning Regionally Essay Sample

Inside a scenario of increased economic interdependence among nations, globalisation is an inadequately understood occurrence. This treatise concentrates on the major players of the globalisation process, typically the firms that drive this – a comparatively small cluster of multinational corporations that carry out and manage most of the particular world’s trade and expense activities.

Typically the numerous, and sometimes, divergent resources on regional multinationals (Rugman & Verbeke 2004/ 2005; Rugman 2005; Rugman & Hodgetts 2001) have intensified the discourse about globalisation and rekindled attention towards relevance of present debates on this economic issue. While existing ideas of global strategy possess taken their departure within the dichotomous local-global distinction (Prahalad & Doz 1987; Bartlett & Ghoshal 1989), it is currently known that intermediate amounts of geographical aggregation, specifically on the regional level, may certainly be the prevailing standard of numerous multinational corporations (MNCs).

Without doubt, the biggest 500 MNCs accounts for more than 百分之九十 of the globe’s share of foreign direct expense plus they carry out fifty percent of the world’s industry (Rugman 2000). However, these organisations are not “global” firms in the perception that they have an extensive and profound transmission of foreign markets throughout the world. In fact, some of them have the great majority of their revenue within their home lower-leg in the triad, that is usually, in United states, the Western european Union (EU) or Asian countries. This fresh perspective upon ‘globalisation’ is extremely barbaridad through the standard, middle associated with the road standpoint. The latter viewpoint centres mostly on macro-level growth models in trade and FDI, and have these data compare with national GDP progress rates, but without actually taking into serious thing to consider the equivalent micro-level progress data for the MNCs responsible for the trade and FDI flows (United Nations, 2002).

FDI, Globalisation and MNCs

One associated with the main vectors regarding globalisation and has perhaps grown in prominence plus significance over the past decade is foreign primary investment or FDI (Jones, 2005; OECD, 2005). The particular multinational corporations from the industrialised countries that served because a conduit for the majority of from the foreign direct investments have given a substantial infusion of resources, technology, promotion, and managerial capability and know-how that, under particular circumstances, have performed a key role inside the process of economic transformation and growth of which many less developed in addition to newly industrialised nations through all over the planet have undergone over the particular past twenty years. Consequently, some firms from developing economies have accumulated adequate resources, knowledge and scientific know-how to invest abroad by themselves and profess the particular category as that associated with emerging multinationals.

The figure on Fortune 500 corporations based plus have established headquarters outside the Triad (North Atlantic and Japan) and Oceania has increased from 21 in 1988 to sixty one in 2005. A classic example is Samsung, which often for less than 10 years, ranks as one of the top 20 most valuable brand names in the world. It is rational to project that this particular drift will continue inside the coming years. One more gauge is that the proportion of foreign assets of the biggest EMNCs to the people of the world’s largest MNC has escalated to 6th. 92% in 2003 coming from 5. 67% in 1999 (UNCTAD 2001; 2005 a ). Certainly, in 2006, Russian Gazprom outshined Microsoft to be quantity three in the planets biggest companies of consequence. Likewise, China Mobile’s marketplace capitalisation surpassed UK’s Vodafone telecom company.

Emerging economies’ MNCs very first surfaced as a center interesting approximately 25 yrs ago after some firms from a few nations around the world initiated overseas expansion actions (Lecraw, 1977). Since it is, the earliest and key developing-country sources of FDI in the latter years were a small number of financial systems that included Brazil, Argentina, Hong Kong, Korea, Indian, Singapore and Taiwan. Then in the late ‘80s, an increasing number of developing nations like Chile, China, Egypt, Malaysia, South america, Russia, South Africa, Asia and Turkey, became essential sources of FDI. Within 2003, outward FDI development rate from developing financial systems has surpassed the expansion associated with companies from the developing nations. While OFDI from countries like Brazil, Russia, India and China attained more attention other developing nations became home to be able to new and significant global businesses (OECD 2005). For example, a Mexican cement conglomerate Cemex , has utilized acquisitions to transform itself into the greatest cement producer in the particular United States or Tenaris of Argentina which is usually the world’s largest producer of seamless tubes credited to its technological edge over its competitors. Also, CP Party in Asia is the biggest singe investor in China in addition to recently, the gargantuan deals which got substantial focus such as the purchase of Wind flow of Italy by Orascom from Egypt, this is said in order to be Europe’s biggest actually leveraged buyout and regarding P& Um by DP World of Dubai.

World of Regional MNCs

A multinational corporation, depending on definition, is an business that produces and/or redirects products and/or services across national borders. They have repetitively been determined and recognized as the drivers of globalization, constantly in pursuit of geographic integration and coordination via facets of global technique such international market contribution, global products, international action location, global marketing in addition to international competitive moves (Yip, 2003).

Advantages of global strategy contains reduction in product standardization costs, cutting down upon duplication of activities, new house purchase of business activities in order to lower cost sites, increased customer preference from worldwide uniformity and consistency and substantial global competitive benefit. However, to fully achieve the gains of worldwide strategy, an MNC requires globally dispersed sales and internationally dispersed production plus activities.

Regional strategy, as described, is usually one that seeks typically the benefits of geographic compression and synchronisation within a new single region or inside a collection of regions. Realistically speaking, such compression and synchronisation lines associated with attack are easier in order to engage in within a single region especially if the home-region government practices policies associated with an international market like cultural, social and politics harmonization, as in the European Union, or economical assimilation, as with GASOLINA and Asia.

As business organizations lengthen outside of their home areas, they then are presented with greater liability of foreignness and other succeeding risks brought about by this international spreading out there and development, not much different from the way since they obtained additional gains and benefits of since of greater geographic range. One risk faced simply by MNCs, a risk which often they need to deal in order to endure, is the reality of inter-block business which is most likely to be restricted simply by government-imposed barriers to admittance. The EU and the particular United States tend to be in a struggle, fighting business wars and are reactive to national petitions seeking for subsidies and/or protection like in the truth associated with the steel and gardening sectors.

Rugman (2000) asserts for a specific drift, over the last quarter century, towards regionalisation and increased intra-regional economic activity. As it is, just in a few industries, for example consumer electronics, is a global strategy of economic assimilation feasible. With regard to most other manufacturing, (automobiles, chemicals, energy, etc. ) and for all providers, (retail, banking, etc. ) regional strategies are the great necessity. Undeniably, presently there is concrete evidence to be able to prove that companies that will execute global strategies execute much better than those who focus on regional strategies, at least, as far as the automobile industry will be concerned (Schlie & Yip 2000).

Rugman and Verbeke (2004) explored and probed into typically the triad/regional economic activity regarding the world’s biggest business organisations within the core triad of the United Says, EU, and Japan. In 2001, of the planets largest 500 firms, 428 were during these core triad regions, whereas back in 1981 it was 445. Data showed 380 firms reporting geographic sales droit, based on information in the annual reports and web pages and these 380 firms were then classified according to which types are global, bi-regional, plus domestic. There were no data for 120 firms (most that were entirely domestic) and insufficient data regarding another 15 firms. The particular main results showed that the intra-regional average product sales for each group had been:

  • 80. 3% for the 320 home region oriented firms;
  • 42. 0% for the 25 bi-regional MNEs;
  • 30. 9% for the eleven host-region ranked firms;
  • 38. 3% for that nine global MNEs.

These figures confirmed the study of the 49 retail MNCs in the 500 (Rugman & Girod 2003). In that specific investigation, just one retail MNC was discovered to be global, particularly LVMH. This result is evident across all business sectors except for electronics, which includes seven associated with the nine global businesses in the set. This is possible that the upstream “back end” production associated with the value chain much more globalised than the downstream “front end” of product sales. Nonetheless, even there this was discovered that regionally-based manufacturing groups and networks, similar to the automobile sector are the norm (Rugman 2000/2005).

Centered on such analysis, local strategy is premised to be able to have a direct effect on the performance of MNCs. However, it was suggested that this relationship is not linear. Regional strategy contributes negatively to MNC performance at initial phases of regionalisation due to the costs linked to any international expansion. But once a good MNC obtains a particular degree and level associated with familiarity with the complete region, further expansion adds positively to its overall performance as a result of learning benefits regarding multinationality , most of which is often accomplished within the home region.

Regional MNCs and Numerous Theories

With the very influential and decisive function of Hymer (1976), a group of researchers have successfully presented a fiscal justification and validation for the cross-border expansion of the firm on the basis regarding transaction cost theory (Caves, 1996). The intrinsic principle of the theory is that markets and firms are usually alternative institutions for executing transactions (Coase, 1937). Consequently, the multinational company (the MNC) is seen and regarded as an efficacious alternate to market transactions such as licensing, to use firm-specific intangibles in a foreign region (Buckely & Casson, 1976; Dunning, 1988). With globalisation growing deeper and increased in the world economy, there now arise a more interesting and interrelated question — how can business organizations maintain the existence, sustain survival and prosper in the international market?

The rationale of the MNC in transaction cost concept is to bypass marketplace imperfections in international markets for firm-specific intangible property. As to the question, therefore, this specific premise presents the information that this growth of MNCs depends on how they can preserve and improve the economic values of their firm-specific assets over time (Caves, 1996). Despite this, the principle is static in characteristics and the level associated with analysis it employs is the transaction, not typically the organisation (Buckley, 1990). With regard to the reasons given, typically the theory has limitations inside fully explaining the powerful growth of MNCs in the international market (Rugman & Verbeke, 1992). In order to prevail on the dilemma, scientists have sought new ideas that can harmonise along with the dominant standard.

Among them, typically the learning perspective is doubtless the most significant (Eriksson, Johanson, Majkgard & Sharma, 1997). Established upon the behavioral theory of the firm (Cyert & Mar, 1992), this framework underscores “experience” as the ultimate way to attain external knowledge that is by its nature difficult to learn (Huber, 1991). Through “learning-by-doing” experience, the firm accumulates prior knowledge which will contribute to the capability to comprehend and assess more complex plus highly sophisticated knowledge inside the focal area. Therefore, the corporation that provides earlier learning experience may be inside a vantage place to integrate and get advantage of the brand new knowledge (Cohen & Levinthal, 1990). In international expansion, this role of encounter is imperatively critical, since most country-specific knowledge offers the characteristics of “experiential knowledge” (Johanson & Vahlne, 1977).

In addition to, another stream of study in international strategic administration suggests “strategic alliances” as a significant way to get over resource deficiencies in worldwide expansion (Kogut & Chang 1991; Lu & Beamish, 2001). This collaborative network framework points to different advantages of alliances, such as low transaction costs, shared risks, reliable access to be able to complementary assets, and organisational flexibility (Powell, 1990; Mowery, Oxley & Silverman, 1996; Gulati, Nohria & Zaheer, 2000). For these reasons, MNCs usually set up tactical alliances with host country firms as a new way to secure country-specific resources and information. The local partners in all those alliances not only supply necessary critical resources (Hennart, 1988; Tsurumi, 1976), but also serve as a main source of local information (Stopford & Wells, 1972; Franko, 1973; Beamish, 1985). Subsequently, this collaborative range of attack has typically the potential to help MNCs in order to overcome the particular liabilities of foreignness and achieve prosperous expansion in the sponsor country (Lu & Beamish, 2001).

These two frameworks are useful in exploring and probing into, for instance, the particular post-entry expansion of Western auto parts suppliers in typically the U. S. First associated with all, the difference among Japanese and U. T. culture is great (Hofstede, 1980), and there is not much commonality in management design between the two countries (Ouchi, 1981; Culpan & Kucukemiroglu, 1993). Hence, Western investors would have a great need to find out about local culture in addition to business practices in typically the U. S. More compared to that, the U. T. automobile industry is very oligopolistic, and the subcontracting practices utilized by the You. S. automobile manufacturers usually are different from those in the Japanese industry (Cusamano, 1989; Dyer, 1996). These industry conditions signify that presently there can be significant entry limitations to Japanese transplant providers seeking new business associations with host country-based manufacturers. Consequently, it could be expected that will Japanese transplant suppliers will certainly benefit greatly from their own host country experience plus alliances with local companies in the U. H. In addition, the organizational learning perspective points to be able to a firm’s domestic company experience being a potentially aspect that may enhance or perhaps constrain its power to create new international skills in addition to expertise (Autio, Sapienza & Almeida, 2000).

According to learning theory (Cohen & Levinthal, 1990), the organisational norms plus routines that have lengthy been developed in typically the domestic context are challenging to unlearn within a short period of time, and might constrain the organisational capability of absorbing new overseas knowledge (Autio, Sapienza & Almeida, 2000). Such impact of domestic experience about international expansion is relevant again in the case of Japanese auto components suppliers. The firm-specific resources that caused their massive FDI in the 1980s were accumulated through their particular close collaborations with big automobile manufacturers in The japanese (Lamming, 1990; Martin, Mitchell & Swaminathan., 1995/1998). Several scholars have reported such cooperative inter-firm relations being a distinctive feature of typically the Japanese business system (Dore, 1983, 1987; Casson, 1991; Kester 1991). Thus, it is possible that, for example, the Japanese auto suppliers which are deeply embedded within domestic supplier relationships may develop organisational capabilities that are far better for the domestic business environment. Their particular home industry-oriented organisational features may hamper their ability and facility to explore start up business relationships in foreign environments.

Theory in addition to Proof of Regional Multinationals

A new vital precept in the particular investigations of regional multinationals is that international growth and cross border compression is more expensive across regional blocks, for instance, between the US plus Japan, than within all of them, like between the US ALL and Canada. There are two principal contentions root this fact (Rugman & Verbeke, 2004/2005), first, ecological diversity is presumed to be higher when typically the MNC operates outside of the residence region than it truly is regarding countries within the house region, due to typically the wider and bigger financial and institutional differences across regional borders. Like for instance, issues of language and cultural norms will make it easier for The spanish language corporations than for Western firms to penetrate the French market. Second, products, understanding, people and capital possess smoother flow between countries within the same location than between regions. Mostly, this is the result of policy-driven regional assimilation within typically the EU, NAFTA and ASEAN and partly due to geographical proximity.

Liability of Foreignness plus Regional Strategy While many studies regarding regionalism have underscored empirics, with significant exclusion in the studies done by Rugman and Verbeke, they totally establish upon and broaden the thought of liability of foreignness , which descends from the work of Hymer (1976). Hymer portrayed the disadvantages (such because foreign firm’s lack regarding information about the host market, host market splendour against outsiders, and swap rate risk) foreign corporations are confronted with when contending against purely nationwide firms inside their home marketplace. Zaheer (1995) subsequently created the term ‘liability regarding foreignness’ and tested the notion empirically by comparing the performance of locally- plus foreign-owned financial trading areas, finding that the former did indeed outperform the particular latter (Zaheer, 1995; Zaheer & Mosakowsky, 1997).

Although not explicitly demonstrated in the research (each trading room had been coded as being possibly foreign or local), the liability of foreignness is usually conceptualised as being triggered in part by “cultural, political, and economic differences” (Zaheer, 1995, p. 341). To put in plainly, the liability of foreignness should be seen not as a great universal constant, but as associated with the diversity plus distance between the residence and host country. Within the framework of regional theory, it is consequently required to make a differentiation between the liability regarding foreignness inside and outside the MNC’s home region. Because described by Rugman plus Brain, “When MNCs have exhausted their growth opportunities in the home-triad in addition to go into other areas, then they face a liability of foreignness and some other additional risks by this particular expansion” (Rugman & Human brain, 2003, p. 7). This specific statement could mean two ways — one is usually the MNC encounters responsibility of foreignness only any time it endeavors and gambles outside its home area, because regional integration will be adequately strong to allow firms the luxury regarding unconstrained internationalisation within the home region. Another that means would be, though weaker yet proves to be the more realistic assumption, is usually that the liability associated with foreignness exists also in the home region (except of course in the home country), but of which it is significantly larger outside of it.

No matter which interpretation is chosen or perhaps adopted, the empirical effects is that MNCs’ international expansion should occur mostly within their home areas, and to a much smaller degree in other regions. Upon the macro-level, this frequency can be assessed via export data (Rugman & Hodgetts, 2001). On the particular firm level, it can be gauged from the geographic dispersion of employees, property, or sales. Rugman plus Verbeke define a “global” firm as one getting more than 20% of its sales in each of the triad areas and no more as compared to 50% in a single location, while the “home region oriented” firm has more as compared to half of its sales in its home region. This leads to the classification associated with 320 of the firms in their Fortune 500 sample as home area oriented and only being unfaithful as global. The getting has been replicated within just several sub-samples, for example, the Japanese companies (Collinson & Rugman, 2006) plus multinational retailers (Rugman & Girod, 2003).


Bartlett, C. A. & Goshal, S. (1989) Managing across boundaries: The transnational solution . Hutchinson: London.

Collinson, S. & Rugman, A. M. (2006) ‘Japanese Business is Regional, not Global. ’ Working Paper. Available at

Fisch, J. They would. & Oesterle, M. M. (2003) ‘Exploring the syndication of German MNCs with the complex spread and diversity measure, ’ Schmalenbach Business Review , 55 , pp. 2-21.

Hymer, S. H. (1976). The international procedures of national firms: A new study of direct

expense. MIT Push, Cambridge, MOTHER

Jones, G. (2005). Multinationals and global capitalism from your nineteenth in order to the twenty-first century. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Lecraw, D. (1977). Direct investment by firms from less-developed countries. Oxford Economics Papers , twenty nine , 3, pp. 442-457

OECD (2005). Measuring Globalisation – OECD Handbook about Economic Globalisation Indicators . Paris.

Prahalad, C. K. & Doz, Y. L. (1987). The multinational mission: Managing local demands and worldwide vision . The Totally free Press: New York.

Ramaswamy, K., Kroeck, K. G. & Renforth, W. (1996). Measuring the degree of

internationalization of the firm: A comment. Journal of Global Business Studies , 27 , 1, pp. 167-177.

Rugman, A. M. & Brain, C. (2003). Multinational enterprises are regional, not global. The Multinational Business Review, 11 , just one, pp. pp. 3-12.

Rugman, A. Mirielle. (2005). Typically the regional multinationals . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Rugman, A. Mirielle. (2000). The end of globalization . London: Random House Business Publications.

Rugman, The. M. & Girod, T. (2003). Retail multinationals and globalization: The evidence Is regional. Western Management Journal, 21 , just one, pp. 24-37

Rugman, A. M. & Hodgetts, R. (2001). Typically the end of worldwide strategy. European Management Journal , 19 , 4, pp. 333-343.

Rugman, A. Mirielle. & Verbeke, A. (2004). A perspective on local and global strategies of

multinational corporations. Journal associated with International Business Studies , 35 , pp. 3-18.

Rugman, A. M. & Verbeke, A. (2005). Toward a theory of local multinationals: A

transaction cost economics approach. Management Global Review , 45, just one, pp. 5-17.

Sammartino, A. & Osegowitsch, T. (2006). “Is Regionalisation all there is? Returning to the empirical evidence concerning the extent of internationalisation by simply large firms. ” Document presented at the School of International Business

United Nations. (2002). World Investment decision Report 2002. UN Conference on Trade and Development: New York and Geneva

Un. (2005). The State of South-South Cooperation, Report of the Secretary-General, Nyc, NY.

Yip, G. S. (2003). Total global strategy II. Upper Saddle Lake, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Zaheer, T. (1995). Overcoming liability regarding foreignness. The Academy of Management Journal , 38, 2, pp. 341-363.

Zaheer, S. & Mosakowski, Electronic. (1997). The dynamics regarding the liability of foreignness: A global study of survival in financial solutions. Strategic Supervision Journal , 18, six, pp. 439 – 463.

Autio, Erkko, Harry J. Sapienza & James G. Almeida. (2000). Effects of age from entry, knowledge intensity, in addition to limitability of international progress. Academy of Management Journal , 43, 5, pp. 909- 924.

Bartlett, D. & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing around borders: The transnational answer . Boston: Harvard Company School Press.

Beamish, P. W. (1985). The characteristics of joint ventures in developed and developing countries. Columbia Journal of Planet Business , 20 , pp. 13-19.

Buckley, L. J. (1990). Problems in addition to developments in the primary theory of international business. Journal of International Business Studies , 21 , pp. 15-24.

Buckley, P. J. & Casson, M. C. (1976). The future of multinational enterprise . London: Macmillan.

Casson, M. C. (1991). The economics of business culture: Online game theory, transaction costs, plus economic performance . Oxford: Clarendon.

Calvert, A. (1981). A synthesis of foreign Direct Investment decision theories and theories associated with the

international firm. Journal of International Business Studies . 13 , pp. 43-60.

Caves, R. Electronic. (1996). International enterprise and economic research ( 2nd impotence. ). Cambridge, U. Nited kingdom.: Cambridge University Press.

Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica , 4, pp. 386-405.

Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A brand new perspective upon learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly , thirty five , 1, pp. 128-152

Culpan, L. & Kucukemiroglu, O. (1993). A comparison of Oughout. S. and Japanese managementstyles and unit effectiveness. Management International Review , 33, 1, pp. 27-42.

Cusamano, M. A. (1985). The Japanese automobile industry , Cambridge: Harvard

University Click.

Cybert, L. & March, J. (1992). A Behavioral theory of the company (2nd impotence. ). Prentice-Hall.

Dore, R.. (1983). Information and the sprit of market capitalism. Uk Journal of Sociology , 34 , pp. 459-482.

Dore, R. (1987). Taking Japan significantly . Stanford: Stanford University or college Press.

Dunning, J. H. (1988). The particular eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement plus some possible extensions. Journal of Global Business Studies , 19 , pp. 1-31.

Dyer, J. H. (1996). Really does governance matter? Keiretsu forces and asset specificity assources of Japanese competitive advantage. Organization Research , 7, 6, pp. 649-66.

Eriksson, K., Johanson, J., Majkgard, A. & Sharma, D. (1997). Experiential knowledge in addition to cost in the internationalisation method. Journal of International Business Studies . 28, 2, pp. 337-360.

Franko, D. G. (1973). Joint venture survival within multinational corporations . NewYork: Praeger.

Gerlach, M. (1992). Alliance capitalism: The interpersonal organization of Japanese company . Berkeley: University associated with California Press.

Gulati, R., Nohria, N. & Zaheer, A.. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal , 21 , pp. 203-15.

Hannan, J. (1998). Rethinking age dependence in organizational mortality: Logical formations. United states Journal of Sociology, American Journal regarding Sociology , 104 , pp. 126-164.

Hofstede, Gary the gadget guy. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related values . Beverly Hill, CA: Sage

Huber, G.. G. (1991). Organizational learning: Typically the contributing processes as well as the literatures. Organization Science , 2, pp. 88-115.

Hymer, S. H. (1976). The international operations of national firms . Cambridge: MIT Press.

Johanson, J. & Vahlne, J. E. (1977). The particular internationalization process of the firm – A type expertise development and improving foreign market commitments. Journal of Worldwide Business Studies , 8 , pp. 23-32.

Kester, W. C. (1991(. Japanese takeovers: The particular global contest for business control . Cambridge, Bulk: Harvard Business School Push.

Kogut, M. (1988). Joint ventures: Assumptive and empirical perspectives. Proper

Management Journal , being unfaithful , pp. 319-332.

Kumon, H., Kamiyama, K., Itagaki, H. & Kawamura, T.. (1994). Industrial analysis by industry varieties. In Tetsuo Abo, manager, Hybrid Manufacturing plant: The Japanese production method in the United Declares . Ny: Oxford University or college Press

Lamming, R. (1990). Strategic alternatives for automotive suppliers within the global market.

International Diary of Technology Management , 5 , pp. 649-84.

Lu, J. and Beamish, P. W. (2001). The internationalization and performance regarding SMEs. Tactical Management Journal , 22 , 6, pp. 565-586.

Martin, Xavier, Will Mitchell & Anand Swaminathan. (1995). Recreating and extending Japan automobile buyer-supplier links in North America. Strategic Management Journal , 16, pp. 589-619.

Mowery, D., Oxley, J. E. and Silverman, B. S. (1996). Proper alliances and interfirm information transfer. Tactical Management Journal , 17 , pp. 77-92.

Nishiguchi, T. (1994). Strategic industrial sourcing . London: Oxford University Push.

Ouchi, Watts. (1981). Concept Z . Reading, Bulk.: Addison Wesley.

Penrose, E. T. (1959). The Theory associated with the growth of the particular firm . Blackwell: Oxford.

Powell, T. W. (1990). Neither industry nor hierarchy: Network kinds of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior , 12 , pp. 295-336.

Rugman, A. M. & Verbeke, A.. (1992). A note around the transnational solution and the

transaction cost theory of multinational strategic supervision. Journal of International Business Studies , 23 , 4, pp. 761-772.

Sako, M. (1992). Prices, quality and trust: Inter-firm relations within Britain and Japan .

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stopford, J. M. & Wells, L. T. (1972). Managing the particular multinational enterprises . Ny: Basic Books.

Tsurumi, Y. (1976). The Japanese are coming: A multinational spread of Japanese firms . Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.